2021 / 11 / 23
Dispute Over Who Jesus Is
21 Once more Jesus said to them, “I am going away, and you will look for me, and you will die in your sin. Where I go, you cannot come.”
22 This made the Jews ask, “Will he kill himself? Is that why he says, ‘Where I go, you cannot come’?”
23 But he continued, “You are from below-;- I am from above. You are of this world-;- I am not of this world. 24 I told you that you would die in your sins-;- if you do not believe that I am he, you will indeed die in your sins.”
25 “Who are you?” they asked.
“Just what I have been telling you from the beginning,” Jesus replied. 26 “I have much to say in judgment of you. But he who sent me is trustworthy, and what I have heard from him I tell the world.”
27 They did not understand that he was telling them about his Father. 28 So Jesus said, “When you have lifted up[a] the Son of Man, then you will know that I am he and that I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me. 29 The one who sent me is with me-;- he has not left me alone, for I always do what pleases him.” 30 Even as he spoke, many believed in him.”
Hence the words of the Pharisees are only squeaks in the area of the knowledge since they never research to understand the truth coming from the Heavenly Kingdom but they howl tearing up the path of clarity with a thunderous noise that always tends to bury the truth in order to give pitiful and stupid praise to a shattering hymn of falsehood.
Accordingly When Jesus the Christ said that he will go where they cannot come, they mentioned a non-existent subject, namely suicide! “22 This made the Jews ask, “Will he kill himself? Is that why he says, ‘Where I go, you cannot come’?”
Hence the confrontation of ideas is hardly possible, but it is always the resounding spirits of darkness that sow the din of a death sentence when Jesus the Christ speaks of Eternal Life, to which there is no possibility that they will accede, knowing that they will die in their premeditated sins.
Hence rhetoric is not a subject to be discussed speaking of the Pharisees but just a thunderous noise of onomatopoeia which does not contribute to the formation of language but deafens the debate of a macabre story of the suicide of the divine illustrating the way of justice! And life! Which can only be followed by criminals agitated by a stormy nature urging them to drown in eternal darkness .
Hence the words spoken by the Pharisees cannot even be placed in the context of a socio-cultural debate, not speaking of the way of divinity, since they did not show any sign of humanity´-or-culture making them belong to "a human group" that discusses its culture but always rules, in the court of hell, to condemn the perfect righteous in order to clear the perfect crime!
Thence the adepts of sects are just perpetrators of serious crimes, It is the devil who uses his deceptive language to speak of rights when he is only seeking to confirm the state of imprisonment of his followers who are always seeking to devour, in his own image, which makes them necessarily out of any socio-cultural context and beyond that they are only subject to servitude and therefore if the human context studded with rights of culture and wisdom is not adapted to this species alien to humanity what about the divine context in which the divine sagacity on earth of the chosen ones of God is developed to contemplate His Face in order to identify the truth coming from the Kingdom of Heaven.
Hence their uttered words remain full of traps in order to condemn the divine due to His Divinity subsequently It is first of all an opposition of substance before being an opposition on the form which touches the substance itself of the evil one who is assimilated to the snake which always seeks in its deceitfulness and its way of reacting instinctively, an exit allowing it to devour the maximum of preys without being devoured from where it provokes a thundering hissing which aims at making of the divine a subject of burial what comes substantially from the Kingdom of Heaven .
Hence, at the dawn of a society that celebrates the agony of the concept itself, which designates "the state of collective life-;- a mode of existence characterised by group life-;-” a concept now at the dawn of death in consented sin and still hidden in the grave of the annihilation of meaning swallowed up under the deluge of the diluvian rains of hypocrisy like an exit thrown from the abyss of darkness that condemns the followers of the devil to consented and well sought servitude!!