Botan Zębarî
2025 / 6 / 12
In the heart of the luminous and shadowed landscape east of the sea—where empires clash with geography and identities wrestle with nationhood—the Kurdish question stands tall, transcending the realm of borders and negotiations. It is a symphony of willpower, unconquered and unyielding, charting the saga of a people who forged their own existence from the depths of fragmentation. From the rubble of colonial marginalization and the disintegration of grand states, the Kurds rose—not as passive victims, but as an influential force, capable of shaping their own path. They hold a rare magic: the ability to bind past and present, to transform wounds into hope, and ambitions into a new geopolitical and cultural map.
For the Kurds, politics is not a stiff diplomatic ritual, but a deliberate dance on the edge of power. They’ve learned the hard way that putting all trust in a single ally is the logic of downfall—a lesson bitterly taught by Iran’s betrayal of the Kurdish revolution in 1975. Since then, they’ve opted for open-ended alliances, negotiating even with adversaries. The experience of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which navigated fluidly between Damascus, Moscow, and Ankara, is a prime example of political pragmatism that shuns raw emotion and focuses instead on achievable goals.
On the stage of international law, the Kurdish soldier and ideologue alike are often stunned to realize that support is not granted by virtue, but by the will of global powers. The question is no longer “How do we ask for support?” but rather “How do we become an indispensable partner in regional stability?” The challenge is to shift from the image of a global supplicant to that of a strategic ally.
Kurds also understand that today’s battles are first waged on digital frontlines before they ever reach the battlefield. Kurdish media, heavy with stories and sorrow, still struggles to relay its narrative to the archives of global conscience. Yet within this lies an opportunity for renewal: to set aside emotional excess and construct a rational narrative—one that showcases the SDF’s fight against ISIS and portrays the Kurdish fighter as a guardian of human values, speaking to the world not in slogans, but in the language of clear, undeniable facts.
As for the Kurdish diaspora, they are more than migrants-;- they are unofficial ambassadors. In the halls of Western universities and the corridors of policymaking, they work to turn the narrative of exile into one of meaningful presence—through establishing Kurdish studies departments and building cultural and political advocacy networks. But the diaspora faces the challenge of fragmentation-;- the greater test lies in transforming into an organized force of influence, rather than a scattered mosaic stretched across borders.
Development, meanwhile, is the internal stronghold. In Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, the peril of oil dependency looms, while in northern Syria, the cooperative economy experiment flickers to life. Both reflect one truth: genuine liberation begins with building a diversified, knowledge-based economy. Education, in turn, must shield Kurdish identity from erosion and nurture a wise openness that balances heritage and modernity.
If the tribe is the smallest cell, then the Kurdish nation—Kurdaitî—is the great clock ticking toward unity. We are evolving from a clustered culture grounded in tribal loyalties to a broader framework that unites identity and purpose. The model of “democratic confederalism,” rooted in radical democracy and decentralization, presents a practical vision of a political community that gives equal space to women, ecology, and culture. Yet enemies—both within and without—have made Kurdish division a permanent strategy. Thus, it is the alliance of political parties and civil institutions that will forge a true national unity.
In the end, the Kurds stand at a critical crossroads: we either remain a pawn in the struggle of great powers,´-or-we become an independent actor—one that shapes the regional equation itself. It is not enough to draft military and political strategies-;- what is needed is a new philosophy of liberation—a philosophy that marries interest-driven realism with uncompromising principle. The Kurds have already proven they can survive. The challenge now is to flourish.
The call of the hour is not to settle within the citadels of survival, but to knock on the doors of civilization itself. A people who launched the first women’s revolution, who fought the most savage forms of terrorism, who endured with dignity across centuries—such a people cannot remain a mere statistic in the footnotes of innocent history. They seek, instead, to write a chapter of exceptional and proud legacy.
|
|
| Send Article ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
| Print version ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |