Saeed Tayseer B Alkhunaizi
2012 / 11 / 1
The uprising in Bahrain can be seen as a part of the general Arab Spring wave in the Middle East that is still occurring. There are unique and separate factors that ignited these revolutions, but all intended to put an end to the corruption among the various governmental sectors. As the case in Bahrian manifested itself in this regard, tens of thousands of people have been demanding their legitimate rights through peaceful protests. The uprising solely has been calling for greater powers for elected institutions, more restrains on the power of the ruling family, and a less corrupted environment in the Bahraini social, political and economic life of the country.
The root of the ongoing protest can be defined in political terms, but since Shia citizens constitute a majority, authorities have always brought the focus on the sectarian differences between both sects. The main objective of the ruling family has been to rule and maintain political monopoly over the state. They have assumed that unless a necessary condition occurs (e.g dismantling the society s structure) they will not be able to sustain their legitimacy. With breaking up existing powers and preventing the two sects from linking up, authorities could possibly remain powerful. For example, the regime has worked on portraying the uprising as a concealed agenda of wilayet-e-faqih , in the public media and social life of Bahrain. There is no question that Shia Bahraini has long standing cultural and religious connections with Iran, sharing a common sect. But this religious connection exists with Iraqi clerics too, and maybe more than that with Iran. Many people go to Iraq and Iran to study religious teachings. And “while some religious Shia Bahrainis seek religious guidance from Iran, most look to Iraqi clerics, especially Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani, who is not a proponent of clerical rule” . Equally important, Shia of Bahrain, most of whom Arab Peninsula tribes, are inhabitants, predating the arrival of Al Khalifa (The ruling family of Bahrain). Their narratives of history often focus on the ‘Baharna’, an ethnic group of Arab Shia being ‘indigenous’. The religious connection with Iran is thus brought in different and misleading contexts to serve political ends, and maintain continuous legitimacy over the state power.
Protestors have always demanded that they get a fair representation and “economic inclusion in a democratic Bahrain” . They demand to have an equal and fair share out of the state resources. The distribution of wealth and power is widely believed to be inclined to Sunni citizens in general, but more specifically, to those who are in familiar terms with the ruling family. In addition, many who work in the security services in Bahrain and the military are mercenaries living in the poverty line, and some of them cannot in fact speak any Arabic. This has created tensions among Shia citizens for their exclusion from the security services, while selective Sunni foreigners get utilized for political ends. For instance, in an effort for Shia to have fewer shares in the economic life, authorities naturalized very selective Sunni groups from Pakistan and other different countries to serve political interests for the ruling family. The vast naturalization of Sunni citizens is aimed to outweigh Shia majorities in Bahrain. The naturalization “is selectively based on racial and sectarian origin rather than on the equal rights of foreigners in getting the citizenship”.
For its part, the protest continues to call for reforms instead of a whole change in the political system. The political vision for Bahrain’s future, which entitled the ‘Manama Document’ , is mainly suggesting an elected government under a constitutional monarchy, a fully elected parliament, a fair and transparent judiciary, and an end to the exclusion of Shia from the security service. They call for these reform proposals to be put to a referendum rather than to be decided by a King.
- The Politicization of Human Rights in Bahrain
In addition, part of the continuous protest going on is due to the International negligence to people s demands in Bahrain. Worldwide organizations and U.S. position has been criticized by oppositions who realistically assume the United States is turning a blind eye on the regime abuses due to U.S. heavy dependence on the security relationship with the Al Khalifa. The Obama Administration has not called for a change of the Al Khalifa regime. This is apparently unlike the Syrian situation, where the U.S policies provided there were very critical to help rebellions against the Syrian military. The social media has enough spoken on behalf of the Syrian people, but this was not experienced in Bahrain at all. While we believe the U.S has some interests in the region, we also believe that any political interests and ends should not interfere with Human Rights responsibilities in the region.
U.S position should balance their relations with the Bahraini government and their commitment to Human Rights issues in the country. Bahrain has been a provider and a key supporter for U.S. interests by hosting U.S. naval headquarters in the past 60 years. Further development to the U.S. military in Bahrain is seeking to plan a $580 million military construction program in Bahrain, in which it will allow larger ships to dock at the naval facility”. However, it has to be understood that the current political status quo in Bahrain does not serve long-term American interests in the region, as it will continue to be a source of instability and chaos; economically or politically. As for that, counterproductive effects can be sought if these uprising eventually succeed in altering the political game in Bahrain. What is seen in the region today is unprecedented public and civil society that challenges the authorities for their rights as citizens. This is evident through the rise of people’s voices as to put an end to discrimination. The optimal path for the U.S should strive to create more prosperous societies that would need genuine political will; responsive, effective, accountable, and inclusive economic growth to all citizens equally. Without this enabling environment, development in Bahrain will be out of reach, and less importantly, U.S position will be at stake. Feasible solutions for the uprising in Bahrain will be put forward in the next section of the paper.
This paper is directed by Prof. Hans Schmitz (co-director of the Transnational NGO Initiative) in a seminar of Human Rights and Public Affairs.
“The justification for Iran’s mixed system of government can be found in the concept of velâyat-e faqîh, as expounded by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the first leader of post-revolutionary Iran. In the absence of the divinely inspired imam, Khomeini’s method gives political leadership to jurist in Islamic canon law, whose characteristics best qualify him to lead the community”.
Kinninmont, Jane. "Bahrain: Beyond the Impasse." P.16. Chatham House: Independent Thinking on International Affairs, June 2012. Web. Oct. 9. http://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/183983
Smith, Lee. "The Bahrain Uprising, Saudi Troops and Hussein the Martyr." The Weekly Standard. 24 Mar. 2011. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/bahrain-uprising-saudi-troops-and-hussein-martyr_555452.html
Kinninmont, Jane. "Bahrain: Beyond the Impasse." P.15. Chatham House: Independent Thinking on International Affairs, June 2012. Web. Oct. 9. http://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/183983
"The mission of Chatham House is to be a world-leading source of independent analysis, informed debate and influential ideas on how to build a prosperous and secure world for all".
"Political Naturalization in Bahrain: Various Violations of Citizens and Foreign Workers Rights." Bahrain Center for Human Rights. Sept. 2006. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. http://www.bahrainrights.org/en/ref06090302
Katzman, Kenneth. "Bahrain: Reform, Security, and U.S. Policy." Congressional Research Center. Page 16. June 2012. Web. 9 Oct. 2012. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/896/
The politicization of Human Rights in Bahrain can be seen as an external cause of the continuous social unrest spanning in the country. However, this subtitle serves also as an introductory for the solution that will be put forward in the next section of the paper.
Katzman, Kenneth. "Bahrain: Reform, Security, and U.S. Policy." P. 25. Congressional Research Center. Page 16. June 2012. Web. 9 Oct. 2012. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/896/.
"STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL JONATHAN GREENERT CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE CONGRESS ON FY 2013 DEPARTMENT OF NAVY POSTURE." Page 3. The U.S Navy. Mar. 2012. For further information please visit the official website and locate the article http://www.navy.mil/
Katzman, Kenneth. "Bahrain: Reform, Security, and U.S. Policy." Congressional Research Center. P.19. June 2012. Web. 9 Oct. 2012. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/896/
Fact Sheet. "Development Diplomacy: Modernizing U.S. Diplomacy To Better Support Development." U.S. Department of State. N.p., 31 July 2012. Web. 11 Oct. 2012. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/pl/2012/195974.htm